Core Strategy - Consultation Draft
List Comments
46 comments.
| Respondent | Response Date | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Deleted User | 16 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. A more positive approach to facilitating such development should be incorporated in the wording.
|
| Deleted User | 15 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. A more positive approach to facilitating such development should be incorporated in the wording.
|
| Deleted User | 15 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
We support the scope given to allowing some housing development to come forward within
the service settlements.
|
| Deleted User | 11 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy.
|
| Deleted User | 03 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy.
The exclusion of Sandford as an identified Service Village is objected to, both in terms of this policy and CS13, CS14 and any other relevant proposed policy.
|
| Deleted User | 03 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. A more positive approach to facilitating such development should be incorporated in the wording.
|
| Deleted User | 24 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. A more positive approach to facilitating such development should be incorporated in the wording.
|
| Environment Agency | 24 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
There is no recognition of flood risk. NSC should use the SFRA to influence any infill, redevelopment or subdivision development. If additional housing is required in this area due to revised growth figures NSC SFRA Level 2 will need to be updated to ensure there is sufficient technical evidence to support this growth area. NSC needs to clarify the position.
|
| Deleted User | 23 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
The requirement for good design is welcomed - concerns are raised on the basis that the policy does not differentiate between the different roles of the service villages. The policy should differentiate between the differing roles of the villages. Some villages such as Long Ashton are subject to greater development needs due their proximity and functional relationship with nearby SSCTs.
|
| Deleted User | 22 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS32: Service Villages CS32: Service Villages
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, the policy should be amended to permit an increased level of both housing and employment development than the very limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. A more positive approach to facilitating such development should be incorporated in the wording.
|