Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Order By
in order

21 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 18 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education CS25: Children, Young People and Higher Education

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/16
  • Status: Accepted
CS 25 Children, Young People and Higher Education 1. The requirements of this policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS3: Environmental Risk Management CS3: Environmental Risk Management

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/3
  • Status: Accepted
The area of search to be the whole of North Somerset should be amended to say that with regard to the Service Villages it is the Service Village and its immediate environs and economic hinterland that is the relevant area of search. In respect of 2) any Council land so identified must have already been formally declared to be surplus and be genuinely available for purchase by private treaty.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS10: Transport and Movement CS10: Transport and Movement

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
CS 10 Transportation 1. The proposed policy should be amended to include a scheme for a Tickenham/Wraxall/Nailsea by-pass or for a link to be provided at Nailsea to the Junction 20 M5 to south Bristol Link.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/9
  • Status: Accepted
Policy should include the urban extension. The proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed. The scale of development proposed to be permitted in respect of the Service Villages and small settlements is too restrictive. Target for net density of 40 dpha is supported need emphasis on range. settlement boundaries will need to be amended. Deletion of all other settlement boundaries is considered unnecessary.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Ensuring Safe and Healthy Communities CS27: Sport, Recreation and Community Facilities CS27: Sport, Recreation and Community Facilities

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
CS 27 Sport, Recreation and Community Facilities 1. The requirements of this policy must be subject to the viability considerations of the proposed development.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 6: Delivery CS35: Implementation

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/22
  • Status: Accepted
CS 35 Implementation 1. In the absence of the relevant Infrastructure Delivery Plan the right must be reserved to make further comments/representations or objections in the future when this information is made available.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/1
  • Status: Accepted
Point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations. Point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way. For instance, an element of greenfield development may be a more sustainable and resource efficient option for the phasing of development and thereby enhance the viability of schemes.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities CS15: Mixed and Balanced Communities

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/10
  • Status: Accepted
The requirements of this policy must also be stated to be subject to consideration of the viability of any development proposed.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps CS19: Green Wedges/Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/13
  • Status: Accepted
Policy should be deleted as it is tantamount to introducing green belt restrictions. Either the land is worthy of green belt status or else it remains countryside. 2. There is a lack of clear guidance upon the appropriate criteria that would be used to make any such assessment and where this would differ from the countryside policies alone.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
An objection is made in respect of the proposed policy in so far as this does not allow for any consequential rolling back of the existing Green Belt at Nailsea in order to provide for the strategic development needs of the District in response to these representations, particularly those relating to policies CS13, CS14, CS20 and CS31.
Next pageLast page