Core Strategy - Consultation Draft
List Comments
72 comments.
| Respondent | Response Date | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Deleted User | 15 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
In respect of point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations.
In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way.
|
| Deleted User | 11 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
In respect of point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations.
In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way.
|
| Deleted User | 10 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
In respect of point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations.
In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way.
|
| Deleted User | 08 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
In respect of point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations.In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way. For instance, an element of greenfield development may actually be a more sustainable and resource efficient option for the phasing of development and thereby enhance viability.
|
| Deleted User | 03 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
In respect of point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations.
In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way.
|
| Deleted User | 02 Mar 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
In respect of point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations. In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way.
|
| Environment Agency | 24 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
Principle 10) is unsatisfactory. Mitigation, including resilience, is the last step in the Flood Risk Management Hierarchy provided by the PPS25 Practice Guide (Assess - Avoid - Substitute - Control - Mitigate). Core Strategy should emphasise avoiding flood risk, locating vulnerable development at lowest flood risk and controlling flood risk over the lifetime of development including flood risk as stated by the SFRA's.
|
| Environment Agency | 24 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
Para 3.10 - NSC refer to "resilience" and not the basic principles of PPS25 by applying the flood risk hierarchy to avoid the risk. Reference has not been made to the purpose of the Level 1 SFRA or the Level 2 SFRA to bring clarity. Why move straight to mitigation? This implies moving straight to high flood risk areas.
|
| Environment Agency | 24 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
Para 3.12 - We are encouraged by the approach to green spaces, and corridors. These can be dual purpose areas with an enhanced commitment to delivery of flood risk management infrastructure including sustainable drainage features in new development, which PPS25 asks LPA's to promote through their policies.
|
| Deleted User | 24 Feb 2010 | Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction CS1: Addessing Climate Change and Carbon Reduction
In respect of point 2) the words "delivered early in the development" should be deleted as this will be an unrealistic proposition in many instances due to viability considerations.
In respect of point 8) there should be greater flexibility than is implied by simply prioritising previously developed land in this way.
|